Doctor.Who.2005.S01.Season.1.720p.BluRay.x264-SHORTBREHD [Public
- Type:
- Video > HD - Movies
- Files:
- 13
- Size:
- 28.38 GiB (30474841436 Bytes)
- Info:
- IMDB
- Uploaded:
- 2013-11-24 18:38:20 GMT
- By:
-
aoloffline
- Seeders:
- 2
- Leechers:
- 2
- Comments
- 12
- Info Hash: 5BF13CE007D63C1136C74E8E2CDB8F4876882E1B
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
PublicHD - High-Definition Bittorrent Community
----------------------------------------------------
Doctor.Who.2005.S01.Season.1.720p.BluRay.x264-SHORTBREHD [PublicHD]
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0436992/
RELEASE DATE.......: 02/11/2013
AiR YEAR...........: 2013
GENRE..............: Adventure/Drama/Familiy
RUNTiME............: ~45mins
ViDEO..............: 1280x720
AUDiO..............: 1509Kbps/5.1/DTS
SUBTiTLES..........: -
SiZE...............: 2240MB
SCREENS
http://someimage.com/TRn9UE8
http://someimage.com/rsUMu7D
http://someimage.com/lB3QjSO
http://someimage.com/pZJcrWW
http://someimage.com/8aWTEUv
http://someimage.com/3mXlEHX
| File list not available. |
Ive been Waiting for this for years thanks so much!!!!!
OMFG!!!!! Thankyou so much, been waiting years for this too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This still is just a remastered upscaled version, right? The original footage is only SD, up to Waters Of Mars ...
@sounddd Yes, it is the upscaled/remastered version. It does look a little bit better but I still think it's an outrage that the BBC expects to sell this at Blu-Ray prices.
Regardless, thank you @aoloffline for sharing!
Regardless, thank you @aoloffline for sharing!
Do these run at 25fps (the correct framerate) or 24fps (the only way they'd have been able to do 1080p for Blu-Ray, as it doesn't support 25p)?
I'd heard the BR box set runs at 24fps with the audio pitch-corrected, so if that's true, in order to get back to the original 25fps you'd also have to replace the audio with the DVD audio, meaning you'd lose the high-bitrate DTS quality...or time-stretch and pitch-shift the DTS audio, which just sounds like a nightmare.
Either way, these will have less compression artifacts than the DVDs do, which is nice, and WILL have higher resolution than the US DVDs (which are 480i, while the original video was 576i).
Not trying to put down your upload, just curious! I'll download when I get home and play around with it myself. I'd like to have these in better-than-DVD quality, but I want to see if I can bring them back to 25p if necessary.
I'd heard the BR box set runs at 24fps with the audio pitch-corrected, so if that's true, in order to get back to the original 25fps you'd also have to replace the audio with the DVD audio, meaning you'd lose the high-bitrate DTS quality...or time-stretch and pitch-shift the DTS audio, which just sounds like a nightmare.
Either way, these will have less compression artifacts than the DVDs do, which is nice, and WILL have higher resolution than the US DVDs (which are 480i, while the original video was 576i).
Not trying to put down your upload, just curious! I'll download when I get home and play around with it myself. I'd like to have these in better-than-DVD quality, but I want to see if I can bring them back to 25p if necessary.
Why speed is so low?
How come these files are so big ? Does anyone here knows about .mkv files ?
hmm, I will try=) thanks for the up!
@Cake23 anoXmous has uploaded a 4gb version for this, link:
http://piratebayproxy.live/torrent/9263265/
http://piratebayproxy.live/torrent/9263265/
@TabascoQuesadilla Do you rip from blu-ray?
Your statement seems strange, as if maybe there is something I don't understand.
The video and audio stream together right? I mean, your player doesn't go read ALL of the audio stream, retain it in memory that doesn't exist, and then somehow try to sync that with the video stream, right? Any audio correction is done BEFORE it ever made it to blu-ray, since the video and audio streams have to be aligned. Is there something I'm missing?
Rips from blu-ray are done at 24fps so that it matches the quality of the blu-ray. Trying to take a blu-ray up to 25 fps means that your software is trying to create pixels to add in one more frame each second.
But, the audio? I don't get it. Your ripping software creates the audio stream to be in-sync with the video stream it is creating, and both are already in sync on the blu-ray. Why does anyone have to mess with it?
I've ripped from blu-ray and I didn't have to do anything to the sound.
Also on what site do you find the original fps for the negative? I can find that the negative is 35 mm digital off IMDB but I guess there is another site I need to be aware of since I look up info like this from time to time.
Your statement seems strange, as if maybe there is something I don't understand.
The video and audio stream together right? I mean, your player doesn't go read ALL of the audio stream, retain it in memory that doesn't exist, and then somehow try to sync that with the video stream, right? Any audio correction is done BEFORE it ever made it to blu-ray, since the video and audio streams have to be aligned. Is there something I'm missing?
Rips from blu-ray are done at 24fps so that it matches the quality of the blu-ray. Trying to take a blu-ray up to 25 fps means that your software is trying to create pixels to add in one more frame each second.
But, the audio? I don't get it. Your ripping software creates the audio stream to be in-sync with the video stream it is creating, and both are already in sync on the blu-ray. Why does anyone have to mess with it?
I've ripped from blu-ray and I didn't have to do anything to the sound.
Also on what site do you find the original fps for the negative? I can find that the negative is 35 mm digital off IMDB but I guess there is another site I need to be aware of since I look up info like this from time to time.
TabascoQuesadilla, BluRays can do 25fps, just as they can do 24 and 23.976.
fucking fagots, seed.
iam downloading at 50kb and seeding at 2mbps
iam downloading at 50kb and seeding at 2mbps
Comments